K327 / K328 / 2027

Lesson 6 of 12 / Nutrition and transport in flowering plants

Reading a limiting-factor graph

Why can extra light stop increasing the rate?

I can explain how light, carbon dioxide and temperature can limit photosynthesis.

  • I can investigate and describe light, CO2 and temperature effects on photosynthesis.Syllabus

    Syllabus K327 / K328, Topic 8(h). Investigate and describe light, CO2 and temperature effects on photosynthesis.

About 6 min

Make a guess. You are not marked.

A greenhouse already has bright light. The grower adds more lamps but the plants grow no faster. Why?

  1. The extra light has damaged the leaves badly.
  2. Something else, such as carbon dioxide, is now limiting.
  3. The plants have stopped photosynthesising.
Show the answer

Something else, such as carbon dioxide, is now limiting.

Extra light helps only while light is in shortest supply. Then another factor holds the rate back.

The key idea

A limiting factor restricts the rate. Increasing it raises the rate only until another factor becomes limiting.

Does more light or more CO2 increase the rate here?

Relative photosynthetic rate

Increasing light intensity

Brown: original CO2 availability. Green: higher CO2. Shading: selected light region. These are qualitative illustrative curves with no numerical scale, not measured data.

Explanation

A limiting factor is the factor that is in shortest supply, so it holds back the rate of a process. Increasing a limiting factor increases the rate; increasing any other factor does not. At low light intensity, absorbed light energy may limit photosynthesis. Increasing light then increases the rate, provided enough carbon dioxide is available and temperature is suitable. A rising part of a rate-versus-light graph is consistent with light limiting the rate under those conditions.

At higher light intensity, a graph may level off. More light now produces little or no increase because another factor limits the rate. Carbon dioxide supply or temperature may be limiting. A plateau by itself does not identify which one; compare another controlled treatment to decide.

If increasing carbon dioxide at the same high light intensity raises the plateau, the original carbon dioxide availability was limiting there. At low light, extra carbon dioxide may have little effect because light still limits the process. Identify the region of the graph rather than assigning one limiting factor to the whole curve.

Exam graphs often show several curves, for example rate against light intensity at two carbon dioxide concentrations or two temperatures. Read them in three moves. First, where the curves overlap, the factor on the x-axis is the limiting factor, because changing the other condition makes no difference there. Second, where the curves separate, the condition that differs between them has become the limiting factor. Third, quote the plateau values with units, for example 5 cm3 per minute at the lower and 8 cm3 per minute at the higher carbon dioxide concentration.

Temperature affects enzyme-controlled reactions. Starting from a low temperature, warming can increase the rate up to an optimum under the stated conditions. Above a suitable range, enzyme activity can be impaired and enzymes may denature, reducing the rate. The optimum is not one fixed value for every species and environment.

Step by step
  1. 1

    Locate the region

    State the factor on the horizontal axis and where the observation lies.

  2. 2

    Describe the pattern

    Use rising, levelling off or falling, supported by the comparison.

  3. 3

    Test the explanation

    Use a second controlled treatment to identify a specific alternative limiting factor.

Worked example

Two light-response curves

At high light intensity, increasing CO2 raises oxygen output. At low light, it makes little difference. Explain both results.

One way to explain it

At high light, CO2 was limiting, so more CO2 allows a higher rate. At low light, light remains limiting, so extra CO2 alone cannot substantially increase the rate.

Why this answer works
  • Use the effect of the changed CO2 treatment as evidence.
  • Give separate explanations for the two light regions.
  • Avoid saying that all factors are always equally limiting.

Watch out for this

A student says: "A flat light-response graph proves the plant has stopped photosynthesising." What is wrong with this?

Show the answer

A plateau shows a steady rate, which can still be high. It means additional light is no longer increasing that rate under those conditions.

Check your understanding

A light-response graph reaches a positive plateau. What can be concluded from that graph alone?

  1. Photosynthesis has completely stopped.
  2. More light is not increasing the rate there; another factor may be limiting.
  3. Carbon dioxide is now the limiting factor, because light can no longer be limiting.
Show the answer

More light is not increasing the rate there; another factor may be limiting.

More evidence is needed to identify which other factor limits the rate.

Exam-style questions

Check your understanding

Invented data: at 0.01% carbon dioxide, the rate of photosynthesis stops rising above light intensity 3 units. At 0.04%, it rises until 6 units. What limits the rate at 0.01% above 3 units?

  1. Carbon dioxide concentration
  2. Water lost by transpiration
  3. Light intensity
  4. The amount of chlorophyll
Show the answer

Carbon dioxide concentration

Raising carbon dioxide raised the plateau, so carbon dioxide was limiting at 0.01%.

Quick recall

Card 1 of 3. Answer in your head, then check.

Why can extra light stop increasing the rate?

You can return to this lesson any time.