Skip to notes
Qualitative Analysis

Topic 4 of 4

Turn observations into a justified conclusion

Use independent evidence and distinguish uncertainty from absence.

O-Level 6092 (2026) / SEC G3 K324 (2027)

Turn observations into a justified conclusion

Use independent evidence and distinguish uncertainty from absence.

A disciplined unknown investigation
  1. Observe before adding reagents

    Record colour, state and whether the sample is already cloudy.

  2. Test fresh portions

    Keep cation, anion and gas tests independent.

  3. Record sequence

    A few drops, excess reagent and warming may give different results.

  4. Infer only what the evidence supports

    Use a second test when several ions fit. Negative results also eliminate possibilities.

Worked example

Identify a dissolved salt

Fresh portions of a solution give a green precipitate with NaOH, insoluble in excess, and a white precipitate with acidified barium nitrate.

  1. The cation result supports Fe2+, not Fe3+ which gives red-brown hydroxide.
  2. The acidified barium test supports SO42-.
  3. Combining ion charges gives FeSO4.
Answer

Iron(II) sulfate is consistent with the evidence. State the observations separately from this inferred identity.

"No change" needs context: no precipitate with ammonia may distinguish calcium from zinc, but a very dilute sample could also make a precipitate hard to see. In an unfamiliar test, report what occurred and draw a general conclusion supported by the instructions; do not invent an ion name from an unfamiliar colour.

Check your understandingWhich is an observation: "chloride is present" or "a white precipitate forms"?Think it through, then reveal the answer
A white precipitate is the observation. Chloride present is an inference that requires the correct silver-nitrate test and suitable acidification.