Full chapter
Qualitative Analysis
Identify ions and gases using observations that distinguish them.
O-Level 5086 / 5088 (2026) / SEC G3 K326 / K328 (2027)
Distinguish aqueous cations
Observe a few drops first, then add the reagent in excess.
Use a fresh small portion of the unknown for each reagent. Add aqueous sodium hydroxide or aqueous ammonia a little at a time, mix, and record any precipitate. Then add excess reagent and record whether that precipitate dissolves. A precipitate is an insoluble solid, not simply a coloured solution.
| Cation | Aqueous NaOH | Aqueous ammonia |
|---|---|---|
| Al3+ | White precipitate; dissolves in excess to a colourless solution | White precipitate; insoluble in excess |
| Ca2+ | White precipitate; insoluble in excess | No precipitate |
| Cu2+ | Light blue precipitate; insoluble in excess | Light blue precipitate; dissolves in excess to a dark blue solution |
| Fe2+ | Green precipitate; insoluble in excess | Green precipitate; insoluble in excess |
| Fe3+ | Red-brown precipitate; insoluble in excess | Red-brown precipitate; insoluble in excess |
| Zn2+ | White precipitate; dissolves in excess to a colourless solution | White precipitate; dissolves in excess to a colourless solution |
| NH4+ | On warming, ammonia evolves; test with damp red litmus | Not a useful ammonium test: the reagent already contains ammonia |
Most precipitates in this table are metal hydroxides. For example, Cu2+(aq) + 2OH-(aq) -> Cu(OH)2(s). The copper ion can give a clear blue solution before reaction and a cloudy light-blue precipitate afterwards; describe both colour and physical change. Complex-ion formulae for reactions with excess ammonia are not required.
Worked example
Distinguish aluminium from zinc
An unknown forms a white precipitate soluble in excess NaOH. What next?
- This result fits both Al3+ and Zn2+; it is not enough to identify either.
- Test a fresh portion with aqueous ammonia, then excess.
- A white precipitate remaining in excess supports aluminium; dissolution to a colourless solution supports zinc.
Use a second discriminating test, rather than repeating the same ambiguous observation.
Check your understandingAn ammonia test changes from a light-blue precipitate to a dark-blue solution in excess. What is the likely cation?Think it through, then reveal the answer
Identify anions with the correct reagents
Acidification matters because contaminants can imitate the result.
| Anion | Procedure | Positive observation |
|---|---|---|
| CO32- | Add dilute acid; pass evolved gas into limewater | Effervescence; gas forms a white precipitate in limewater |
| Cl- | Acidify solution with dilute nitric acid, then add aqueous silver nitrate | White precipitate of AgCl |
| SO42- | Acidify solution with dilute nitric acid, then add aqueous barium nitrate | White precipitate of BaSO4 |
| NO3- | Add aqueous NaOH and aluminium foil, then warm carefully; test the gas | Ammonia turns damp red litmus blue |
Nitric acid removes interfering carbonate before the silver or barium test. Do not use hydrochloric acid to acidify for chloride: it introduces the ion being tested. Likewise, sulfuric acid would introduce sulfate. Record the original sample result using clean apparatus and separate portions; do not carry reagents from one test into another.
For nitrate, aluminium in alkaline solution reduces nitrate to ammonia. Ammonium ions also release ammonia with warm NaOH, even without aluminium. If ammonium could be present, check that separately and account for it before attributing ammonia to nitrate. Formulae of complex products are not needed for this identification.
Check your understandingA student acidifies an unknown with hydrochloric acid before adding silver nitrate. Why is a white precipitate inconclusive?Think it through, then reveal the answer
Identify the gas, not just the bubbles
A named gas needs a specific test and observation.
| Gas | Test | Positive observation |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrogen, H2 | Apply a lighted splint to a small collected sample | A pop |
| Oxygen, O2 | Insert a glowing splint | Splint relights |
| Carbon dioxide, CO2 | Bubble through limewater | White precipitate; prolonged excess CO2 can dissolve it |
| Ammonia, NH3 | Hold damp red litmus in the gas | Turns blue |
| Chlorine, Cl2 | Expose damp litmus paper to the gas | Bleaches; damp blue litmus may first redden |
| Sulfur dioxide, SO2 | Use acidified potassium manganate(VII) solution | Purple solution becomes colourless |
Litmus must be damp so the gas can dissolve and show its acidic or alkaline effect. Do not identify a gas by smell. Write "effervescence" for bubbles, then describe the confirmatory test. Carbon dioxide extinguishing a flame is less diagnostic than limewater; several gases fail to support combustion.
The sulfur dioxide test is required theory, but candidates are not required to carry out tests involving sulfur dioxide gas in the practical examination. Its colour change reflects reducing behaviour; other reducing substances can also decolourise acidified manganate(VII), so use the experimental context.
Check your understandingA glowing splint is extinguished. Does that identify hydrogen?Think it through, then reveal the answer
Turn observations into a justified conclusion
Use independent evidence and distinguish uncertainty from absence.
- Observe before adding reagents
Record colour, state and whether the sample is already cloudy.
- Test fresh portions
Keep cation, anion and gas tests independent.
- Record sequence
A few drops, excess reagent and warming may give different results.
- Infer only what the evidence supports
Use a second test when several ions fit. Negative results also eliminate possibilities.
Worked example
Identify a dissolved salt
Fresh portions of a solution give a green precipitate with NaOH, insoluble in excess, and a white precipitate with acidified barium nitrate.
- The cation result supports Fe2+, not Fe3+ which gives red-brown hydroxide.
- The acidified barium test supports SO42-.
- Combining ion charges gives FeSO4.
Iron(II) sulfate is consistent with the evidence. State the observations separately from this inferred identity.
"No change" needs context: no precipitate with ammonia may distinguish calcium from zinc, but a very dilute sample could also make a precipitate hard to see. In an unfamiliar test, report what occurred and draw a general conclusion supported by the instructions; do not invent an ion name from an unfamiliar colour.
Check your understandingWhich is an observation: "chloride is present" or "a white precipitate forms"?Think it through, then reveal the answer
Quick revision
Revisit the essentials, then return to an explanation when you need it.
For cations, record precipitate colour and behaviour in excess reagent. Use fresh portions. For chloride/sulfate tests acidify with nitric acid; do not introduce the ion being tested.
Check your understandingWhich reagent distinguishes Al3+ from Zn2+ after both dissolve in excess NaOH?Think it through, then reveal the answer
Scope and references
Learning outcomes and sources
6. Qualitative Analysis (5086 / 5088 / K326 / K328). Use the outcome map to find the explanation for a particular syllabus requirement.
See the learning outcome map
6(a) Identify aqueous cations
- NaOH and/or ammonia; precipitate formation and excess solubility
- Al3+, NH4+, Ca2+, Cu2+, Fe2+, Fe3+, Zn2+
- Ammonium warming and evolved gas
- Complex-ion formulae not required
Distinguish aqueous cationsTurn observations into a justified conclusion
6(b) Identify anions
- Carbonate with dilute acid and limewater
- Chloride with nitric acid and silver nitrate
- Nitrate with aluminium/NaOH, warming and damp red litmus
- Sulfate with nitric acid and barium nitrate
Identify anions with the correct reagentsTurn observations into a justified conclusion
6(c) Identify gases
- NH3 damp red litmus
- CO2 limewater
- Cl2 damp litmus
- H2 lighted splint
- O2 glowing splint
- SO2 acidified manganate(VII)
- 2026 Pure Chemistry 6092
Official topic 6, pages 16. Original explanations mapped to the stated outcomes; 2026 and 2027 topic content agrees.
- 2027 Pure Chemistry K324
Official topic 6, pages 16. Original explanations mapped to the stated outcomes; 2026 and 2027 topic content agrees.
- 2026 Combined Chemistry 5086 / 5088
Official topic 6, pages 31. Original explanations mapped to the stated outcomes; 2026 and 2027 topic content agrees.
- 2027 Combined Chemistry K326 / K328
Official topic 6, pages 31. Original explanations mapped to the stated outcomes; 2026 and 2027 topic content agrees.