9478 / 2027
Gravitational Fields overview

Full chapter

Gravitational Fields

All 5 topics and the revision summary on one page.

01

Mass, force and field strength

Gravitational force depends on both interacting masses. Field strength describes the force per unit test mass at a position, so it depends on the source and the position rather than the small test mass you choose.

Newtonian attraction

Two point masses M and m attract each other with force magnitude:

F = GMm/r2

G is the universal gravitational constant, in N m2 kg-2. Here M names the source mass and m the small test mass, both in kg. The distance r joins the masses, in metres. The force acts along that joining line, towards the other mass.

The forces on the two bodies are equal and opposite, but act on different bodies. They do not cancel in the equation for either body. Treating a much more massive source as fixed neglects its very small motion, not its interaction with the test mass.

For a point outside a spherically symmetric body, use the body's mass as concentrated at its centre. At altitude h above a surface of radius R, the required separation is r = R + h. This rule applies outside the body; it does not give the field at points inside it.

At fixed masses, doubling r quarters the force. At fixed r, doubling either mass doubles the force on each partner.

Derive the point-mass field

Gravitational field strength is gravitational force per unit test mass at a point. Dividing the force law by m gives:

g = F/m = (GMm/r2)/m
g = GM/r2

Here g is the magnitude, in N/kg. The field points towards the source centre. The small test mass cancels: a heavier test body has more gravitational force, but the same force per unit mass at that position.

If outward radial direction is positive, the signed component is gr = -GM/r2. Keep the positive magnitude g separate from the negative outward-axis component gr. A minus sign in that component means inward, not repulsion.

Estimate the field scale

Using supplied rough scales GM about 4 × 1014 m3/s2 and surface radius R about 6 × 106 m, the ratio GM/R2 is of order 10 N/kg. These rounded scales give a plausibility check before the more precise model calculation.

Worked spherical-body model

Use centre distance, not altitude

For the following examples, use the supplied model product GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2 and body radius R = 6.4 × 106 m. The source is spherical, its centre is treated as fixed, and other bodies' gravity is neglected. GM is a supplied product of G and source mass, not a separate universal constant.

At the surface, r = R:

g(R) = (4.0 × 1014)/(6.4 × 106)2
= 9.765625 N/kg ≈ 9.8 N/kg

At centre distance r = 8.0 × 106 m, the altitude is:

h = r - R = 1.6 × 106 m
g = (4.0 × 1014)/(8.0 × 106)2
= 6.25 N/kg

A 400 kg body there experiences gravitational force F = mg = 2500 N inward. Substituting the altitude 1.6 × 106 m for r would give the wrong field and force.

A radial field can look nearly uniform in a small region

Exterior field of a spherically symmetric source

External gravitational field lines point towards the source centreA spherical source is drawn as a circle centred on O. Eight representative external radial field lines extend to its surface, with all green arrows directed inward. The lines do not cross in the exterior region. The source interior is masked and has no field construction. A marked small surface region near the top is the location for the following local view. This is a schematic field pattern, not a numerical field-strength scale or a drawing of field inside the body.MCentre OSmall regionField direction is inward.

Enlarged local view near the surface

Nearby field lines are almost parallel towards a distant centreThe surface is a shallow circular arc with its centre far below the displayed patch. Five green field lines are straight radial lines towards that same distant centre; their downward arrows converge slightly rather than being exactly parallel. All arrows remain outside the surface. The surface curvature and small directional changes explain why a small region and a height change much less than the source radius can be treated as approximately uniform. This panel is an independently enlarged schematic local view, not on the same distance scale as the whole source. Arrow lengths are not numerical magnitudes.Almost parallel, almost unchangedSurfaceSource centre is far below this view.

Both direction and magnitude change little over a sufficiently small near-surface region. The exact magnitude ratio is g(R + h)/g(R) = [R/(R + h)]2; the constant-g approximation does not extend to infinity.

The spatial field model uses distance from the source centre and inward field directions. A small surface region can be treated as nearly uniform when changes in distance and direction are small.

Extra digits retained in the examples allow comparisons without repeated rounding. They describe the supplied model, not that precision in measured planetary constants.

Optional check A spherical body has GM = 4.0 x 10^14 m^3/s^2 and radius R = 6.4 x 10^6 m. A small object is at altitude h = 1.6 x 10^6 m. What is the gravitational field-strength magnitude there?
A spherical body has GM = 4.0 x 10^14 m^3/s^2 and radius R = 6.4 x 10^6 m. A small object is at altitude h = 1.6 x 10^6 m. What is the gravitational field-strength magnitude there?

Why a near-surface field can be approximately uniform

At height h, the exact ratio in the spherical model is:

g(R + h)/g(R) = [R/(R + h)]2

When the height change is much smaller than R, the radius barely changes. Within a small surface region, the directions towards the distant centre are also nearly parallel. These are the conditions behind a locally uniform downward field and the approximation ΔEp = mgΔh with nearly constant g.

The approximation does not extend to all altitudes. In the worked example, r = 1.25R, so g = g(R)/1.252 = 0.64g(R). The field has changed substantially, and constant surface g would be unsuitable.

Field strength and free-fall acceleration

If gravity is the only force on a body, Newton's second law gives mg = ma, so its acceleration has magnitude g and points inward. The units are equivalent:

1 N/kg = 1 m/s2

Field strength is defined through force per unit mass; acceleration is defined through velocity change per unit time. They are equal for free fall under gravity alone. Support or drag can change the resultant acceleration without removing the gravitational field.

An astronaut and spacecraft can fall together with little or no usual support force between them. That apparent weightlessness is compatible with the substantial 6.25 N/kg field at the quoted orbital radius; it is not evidence of zero gravity.

02

Potential and potential energy

Gravitational potential is an energy-per-mass quantity at a point. Gravitational potential energy belongs to a specified interacting system and also depends on the test body's mass.

Choose the zero at infinity

Gravitational potential φ at a point is the work done per unit mass by an external force in bringing a small test mass from infinity to that point, without a change in kinetic energy. Its unit is J/kg.

Set the potential to zero at infinite separation. This is an energy reference. Bringing the test mass inward slowly lets gravity do positive work. To prevent a kinetic-energy increase, the external agent does negative work, so the potential at the finite point is negative.

φ = -GM/r

This is the point-source potential and the exterior potential of a spherical source with zero at infinity. The radius is centre distance. Negative potential does not mean negative mass or an outward force: it describes the work relative to the chosen zero.

Multiply by mass to obtain system energy

For source mass M and test mass m separated by r, the gravitational potential energy is:

UG = mφ = -GMm/r

UG names the gravitational potential energy of the two-mass interaction, in joules. It is the gravitational case of the potential energy Ep used earlier, so Ep = UG in this account. It is not an additional energy store to add again.

Changing the small test mass at a fixed position leaves φ unchanged in this source-field model, but changes UG in proportion to that mass. Keep potential in J/kg distinct from potential energy in J.

Estimate the potential and energy scales

Using the rough inputs GM about 4 × 1014 m3/s2 and R about 6 × 106 m gives |φ| about 7 × 107 J/kg. For a roughly 400 kg test body, |UG| is of order 3 × 1010 J. Both signed values are negative with the infinity reference.

Worked outward transfer

A less negative potential energy is an increase

Use GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2, R = 6.4 × 106 m and a 400 kg body. At the surface:

φ1 = -(4.0 × 1014)/(6.4 × 106)
= -6.25 × 107 J/kg
UG,1 = 400φ1 = -2.50 × 1010 J

At the larger centre distance r2 = 8.0 × 106 m:

φ2 = -(4.0 × 1014)/(8.0 × 106)
= -5.00 × 107 J/kg
UG,2 = 400φ2 = -2.00 × 1010 J

Moving outward raises the system's gravitational energy

For the 400 kg body, these are energy levels, not positions on a distance axis. The reference UG = 0 is the limit of indefinitely large separation.

Negative gravitational potential energy becomes less negative on an outward moveAn energy-level axis is labelled in ten to the ten joules, increasing upward. The infinity reference is zero; it is an energy reference rather than a finite radius drawn in space. The 400-kilogram system has gravitational potential energy negative 2.50 times ten to the ten joules at the surface, radius 6.4 million metres, and negative 2.00 times ten to the ten joules at radius eight million metres. Their vertical positions share an energy scale of one hundred drawing units per ten to the ten joules. An upward brown arrow between these levels shows the positive 0.50 times ten to the ten joule change. Gravity does the negative of that work. The diagram does not include final orbital kinetic energy.UG / 1010 J0Zero reference:r tends to infinity-2.0-2.5r = 8.0 × 106 mR = 6.4 × 106 m+0.50

ΔUG = +5.00 × 109 J; work by gravity is -5.00 × 109 J. This is a potential-energy change, not the complete energy needed to enter a circular orbit.

The two positions have different potentials and interaction energies. Moving outward makes the negative potential energy less negative. The zero at infinite separation is a limiting reference, not another finite position.
ΔUG = UG,2 - UG,1
= -2.00 × 1010 - (-2.50 × 1010)
= +5.00 × 109 J

The potential-energy increase is positive. It is the energy needed to raise this interaction energy between the two positions, before accounting for a kinetic-energy change or losses.

Optional check At a point with gravitational potential -5.00 x 10^7 J/kg, a 400 kg test body is placed in the source field. With zero potential energy at infinite separation, which statement is correct?
At a point with gravitational potential -5.00 x 10^7 J/kg, a 400 kg test body is placed in the source field. With zero potential energy at infinite separation, which statement is correct?

Give work its correct sign and recipient

For movement from r1 to r2, subtract the two potential energies:

ΔUG = GMm(1/r1 - 1/r2)
Wgravity = -ΔUG

During the outward transfer above, gravity does -5.00 × 109 J of work because its force opposes the outward displacement. If an external agent moves the body with no kinetic-energy change and no other transfer, its work is +5.00 × 109 J.

If kinetic energy changes, the external work must account for that too. With no dissipative transfer, Wexternal = ΔEk + ΔUG. Include any relevant losses or other stores in a more complete account. The field-work relationship does not say every applied work equals ΔUG under all conditions.

In particular, raising the body to a satellite's radius is not enough to put it into a circular orbit. That final state also needs the orbital kinetic energy.

03

Field from a potential gradient

The field at a point comes from how quickly potential changes with position, not from the potential's value there. Use a local tangent and include the negative sign.

Take radial distance r as positive outwards from the source centre, and set φ = 0 at infinity. For the exterior field of an isolated spherical source, φ = -GM/r. Moving outwards makes φ less negative, so its graph rises towards zero.

gr = -dφ/dr

The notation dφ/dr means the local gradient of potential against outward radius. The signed radial field component is its negative. A positive potential gradient therefore gives a negative gr, meaning an inward field.

This agrees with work: a small outward displacement raises gravitational potential energy, so gravity does negative work. Gravity acts towards decreasing potential. The vector direction is not obtained simply by asking whether the potential itself is positive or negative.

Read graph height and gradient as different quantities

Use GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2 and source radius R = 6.4 × 106 m. The table values are calculated from the exterior model; the displayed decimals are rounded where necessary.

Potential and signed radial field outside the model source
r / (106 m)φ / (MJ/kg)gr / (N/kg)
6.4-62.5-9.765625
12.8-31.25-2.44140625
19.2-20.833333-1.08506944
25.6-15.625-0.61035156

Potential height and potential slope are different quantities

Use GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2, with outward positive. Only the exterior r ≥ R = 6.4 × 106 m is drawn. These smooth curves come from the supplied model, not measured samples joined by straight lines.

Potential increases towards zero from below

Potential increases towards zero from belowFor the supplied GM product four times ten to the fourteen, the exterior potential is negative GM divided by radius. Radius runs from 6.4 to 25.6 million metres; the vertical axis is potential in megajoules per kilogram. The analytic curve passes through minus 62.5, minus 31.25, minus 20.833333 and minus 15.625 at the four equally spaced radius marks. It increases towards zero while staying negative at every finite displayed radius. The zero axis is an asymptotic reference, not a finite-radius point on the curve. No interior continuation is drawn.6.412.819.225.60-20-40-60φ / MJ/kgCentre radius r / 106 m

The potential φ = -GM/r is a negative reciprocal curve. It rises towards zero with increasing radius. Reflecting it across zero gives the positive magnitude GM/r.

Outward-positive field component is negative

Outward-positive field component is negativeThe same exterior radius scale is used. Outward is positive, so the radial gravitational field component is negative GM divided by radius squared, in newtons per kilogram. Values at 6.4, 12.8, 19.2 and 25.6 million metres are approximately minus 9.765625, minus 2.441406, minus 1.085069 and minus 0.610352. The smooth curve stays below zero and becomes less negative with radius. Its reflection across the zero line would give the positive inverse-square field magnitude. No finite point is labelled as infinity and no interior source model is implied.6.412.819.225.60-2.5-5-7.5-10gr / N/kgCentre radius r / 106 m

The component gr = -GM/r2 is negative because gravity points inward. Reflecting this curve across zero gives |gr| = GM/r2, the positive inverse-square magnitude.

Read the tangent at r = 8.0 × 106 m

This enlarged view shows only negative potentials from -65 to -35 MJ/kg; zero is outside the displayed vertical range. Blue is the potential curve. Brown is its tangent.

Tangent guide points differ from points on the potential curveThe enlarged analytic potential curve spans radii 6.4 to 9.6 million metres and potentials minus 65 to minus 35 megajoules per kilogram. The vertical range excludes zero. The brown tangent contacts the blue curve at C, radius eight million metres and potential minus fifty megajoules per kilogram. Hollow squares A and B lie on the tangent at 6.4 million metres and minus sixty megajoules per kilogram, and 9.6 million metres and minus forty megajoules per kilogram. They are line-construction points, not measurements or points on the blue curve. The actual curve at these endpoint radii is lower, at minus 62.5 and approximately minus 41.6667 megajoules per kilogram. The tangent rises by twenty million joules per kilogram over 3.2 million metres, so its slope is positive 6.25 newtons per kilogram. The outward field component is the negative of this slope, negative 6.25 newtons per kilogram.6.48.09.6-65-60-50-40-35ABCφ / MJ/kgCentre radius r / 106 m

Squares A and B are on the tangent only. Their slope is (+20.0 × 106 J/kg)/(3.2 × 106 m) = +6.25 N/kg. Hence gr = -dφ/dr = -6.25 N/kg. The curve's height, -50.0 MJ/kg at C, is potential, not field strength.

Neither potential nor field reaches zero at a finite radius for this isolated-source model. Their zero limits refer to r increasing without bound.

The potential and field graphs use the same outward radial coordinate but different vertical quantities and units. The enlarged potential graph shows a true local tangent; its marked guide points lie on that line and are not additional readings from the curve.

Both curves stay below zero under this convention, approaching zero as r increases. Their zero lines represent the infinity limit; neither quantity becomes exactly zero at a finite radius in this isolated-source model. The curved functions should not be replaced by straight segments joining the table entries.

Reflecting the negative curves across their horizontal zero lines gives the corresponding positive magnitudes: |φ| = GM/r has a 1/r shape, while |gr| = GM/r2 has a 1/r2 shape. At twice the centre distance, the potential magnitude halves and the field magnitude quarters. This comparison uses the same exterior domain r ≥ R; it says nothing about the source's interior.

Worked local tangent

Find the field at r = 8.0 × 106 m

The potential at this position is -5.00 × 107 J/kg. Draw the tangent at that point. Two convenient points on the tangent line are:

(6.4 × 106 m, -60.0 × 106 J/kg)
(9.6 × 106 m, -40.0 × 106 J/kg)

These guide points provide the line's gradient; they are not values of the curved potential function at those radii. In particular, the actual curve value at 6.4 × 106 m is -62.5 MJ/kg, not -60.0 MJ/kg.

Tangent gradient = [(-40.0) - (-60.0)] × 106
/ [(9.6 - 6.4) × 106]
= +6.25 (J/kg)/m

The numerator is in J/kg and the denominator in metres. Both graph scale factors are 106, so they cancel here. Always check the scales rather than assuming a plotted gradient is already in SI units.

gr = -6.25 (J/kg)/m = -6.25 N/kg

The field's magnitude is 6.25 N/kg and its direction is inward. Potential has units J/kg; its gradient has units (J/kg)/m = N/kg because 1 J = 1 N m.

A long chord between two curve points gives an average potential gradient over that interval, not necessarily the field at a particular point. Use the tangent at the required radius, not the potential's graph height or an arbitrary chord.

Optional check Outward radial distance is positive. At one point, the local tangent to the potential-radius graph has slope +6.25 (J/kg)/m. What is the radial field component?
Outward radial distance is positive. At one point, the local tangent to the potential-radius graph has slope +6.25 (J/kg)/m. What is the radial field component?

Zero field need not mean zero potential

For a separate comparison, hold two equal source masses at equal distances on opposite sides of a midpoint. At that point their equal field vectors point in opposite directions, so the total field is zero.

Potential contributions add as scalars. With zero at infinity, each source contributes a negative potential at the midpoint, so the total potential is still negative. Vector cancellation of force per mass does not require the energy per mass to vanish.

04

Escape using an energy account

Minimum escape means reaching indefinitely large separation with speed tending to zero. Set that final condition in an energy account rather than extending constant-g mgh to an infinite height.

Use a spherical source of mass M, treated as fixed, and a much smaller body of mass m starting at centre distance r. Neglect atmosphere, other massive bodies, dissipative effects and propulsion after release. Choose a path that avoids collision with the source; begin with an outward launch.

With zero gravitational potential energy at infinity, UG = -GMm/r. Mechanical energy Ek + UG is conserved during this unpowered motion under the stated assumptions.

Derive the minimum speed from the final condition

For the minimum escape case, both UG and Ek tend to zero at indefinitely large separation. The initial mechanical energy must therefore be zero:

½mvescape2 - GMm/r = 0
½vescape2 = GM/r
vescape = √(2GM/r)

The test mass cancels from the speed threshold. Its required kinetic energy still depends on mass. This equation gives a speed magnitude, not a unique velocity direction; the proposed direction must also avoid the source and satisfy the model assumptions.

Estimate the scale

With rough GM about 4 × 1014 m3/s2 and R about 6 × 106 m, the square root of 2GM/R is of order 104 m/s. For a roughly 400 kg body, the required kinetic energy is of order 3 × 1010 J, matching the magnitude of its initial negative potential energy.

Worked surface escape

Balance positive kinetic and negative potential energy

Use the supplied model GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2 and surface radius R = 6.4 × 106 m:

vescape = √[(2 × 4.0 × 1014)/(6.4 × 106)]
= 1.118 × 104 m/s
≈ 11.2 km/s

For the 400 kg body, the initial potential energy is -2.50 × 1010 J, so the minimum initial kinetic energy is +2.50 × 1010 J.

At the minimum escape threshold, total mechanical energy is zero

Release the 400 kg body outward from the model surface. Assume no atmosphere, no further propulsion, no other significant source and negligible central-body motion.

Positive surface kinetic energy exactly balances negative gravitational potential energyThe vertical energy scale is in ten to the ten joules. At the surface, a positive kinetic-energy bar of 2.50 and a negative gravitational potential-energy bar of minus 2.50 have equal heights, 120 drawing units, on opposite sides of zero. Their total is zero, marked by a point rather than a bar. For minimum escape the body moves outward while kinetic energy decreases and gravitational potential energy increases. The separately written far-separation limit has K tending to zero, U subscript G tending to zero from below and total energy zero. This is a limiting energy account, not an infinity position at a finite point on a trajectory.Energy / 1010 JAt surface release0K+2.50-2.50UGTotal0As r grows without bound:K → 0; UG → 0 from belowTotal energy remains zero.

The surface threshold is K = 2.50 × 1010 J, giving speed about 11.2 km/s. At minimum escape the speed tends to zero only at indefinitely large separation; it does not become zero at a finite height in this model.

At the minimum threshold, positive kinetic energy and negative gravitational potential energy sum to zero. As separation increases without bound, both approach zero. Infinity is a limiting condition, not a finite zero-field location.

From the larger starting radius r = 8.0 × 106 m, the same model gives vescape = 1.00 × 104 m/s = 10.0 km/s. The source is less strongly binding there, so less initial speed is required for escape.

Compare launch speeds using total energy

  • At the minimum speed: total mechanical energy is zero, and speed tends to zero at infinity.
  • Above the minimum: total mechanical energy is positive, leaving nonzero kinetic energy at large separation in this model.
  • Below the minimum: total mechanical energy is negative, so the body cannot reach infinity without further energy input under the stated assumptions.

For a greater launch speed u and residual far-away speed v, the account becomes ½mu2 - GMm/r = ½mv2. Minimum escape is the special case v = 0.

Real launch energy can involve source rotation, atmospheric losses and continuing propulsion. The ideal threshold does not include those effects. Surface g also decreases with altitude; a constant-g mgh expression cannot describe lifting to infinity.

Optional check For an unpowered outward launch in an isolated, fixed-source gravity model, which final condition defines the minimum escape speed from a given radius?
For an unpowered outward launch in an isolated, fixed-source gravity model, which final condition defines the minimum escape speed from a given radius?

05

Circular orbits and geostationary satellites

A circular orbit needs the correct tangential speed at its radius. Gravity supplies the inward acceleration; an energy account then distinguishes reaching that radius from reaching the complete orbital state.

Model a small satellite m outside a spherical central mass M that is effectively fixed. Neglect drag, thrust and other gravitational sources. The radius r is measured from the source centre, not its surface.

On this page: orbital energy; radius-period data; geostationary conditions.

Use gravity as the inward resultant

Uniform circular motion requires inward acceleration v2/r = rω2. Gravity supplies the actual force:

GMm/r2 = mv2/r = mrω2
v = √(GM/r)

The small satellite mass cancels. At a fixed radius around the same source, its required speed is independent of its mass, although the gravitational force is proportional to that mass.

As in the radial-force method, centripetal describes the resultant's role, not an extra interaction to add to gravity. There is no outward balancing force in this inertial-frame account. Constant speed still involves changing velocity and inward acceleration.

The period T is time for one complete revolution. Substitute v = 2πr/T into the radial equation:

GM/r = 4π2r2/T2
T2 = 4π2r3/(GM)
T = 2π√[r3/(GM)]

Larger circular orbits around the same source have lower speed and longer period. The relation v = rω does not imply greater speed at larger r here, because the different orbits do not have the same angular speed.

Estimate the orbit scale

For supplied rough scales GM about 4 × 1014 m3/s2 and centre distance r about 8 × 106 m, the speed is about 7 × 103 m/s. The circumference divided by that speed gives a period of about 7 × 103 s, of order 2 hours. These checks precede the more precise calculation.

Worked orbit and energy account

A 400 kg body at centre radius 8.0 × 106 m

Use GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2 and source radius R = 6.4 × 106 m. The orbit altitude is h = r - R = 1.6 × 106 m.

v = √[(4.0 × 1014)/(8.0 × 106)]
= 7071.07 m/s ≈ 7.07 km/s
T = 2πr/v = 7108.61 s ≈ 1.97 h

The field magnitude there is 6.25 N/kg, so the 400 kg body's gravitational force is 2500 N inward. Its velocity is tangent to the orbit.

A circular orbit needs both the correct inward force and kinetic energy

Use centre radius r = R + h

A tangent velocity and only inward gravity in the circular-orbit modelA spherical central body and circular orbit share centre O. Their radii are 96 and 120 drawing units, preserving the model distance ratio 6.4 to eight million metres. The satellite symbol itself is not to size. At the rightmost orbit point a blue tangent velocity arrow points up for anticlockwise motion. The only physical force on the 400-kilogram satellite is purple gravity, pointing left towards the centre, with magnitude 2500 newtons. There is no extra centripetal or outward balancing force. Projected dimensions identify surface radius R, altitude h from the surface and total centre radius r. The satellite's altitude is 1.6 million metres, while its orbital radius is eight million metres.Central bodyOvGravity2500 NR and r use one distance scale.Rhr = R + h

R = 6.4 × 106 m and h = 1.6 × 106 m give r = 8.0 × 106 m. The circular speed is about 7.07 km/s; this is different from the 10.0 km/s minimum escape speed at that same radius.

The full surface-rest to circular-orbit energy account

The model surface is nonrotating. All bars share one energy scale, in 1010 J. Negative values extend left of zero; positive values extend right. E = K + UG is total mechanical energy.

The required mechanical-energy increase is fifteen billion joulesTwo signed bar accounts use one scale, seventy drawing units per ten to the ten joules, and the same zero coordinate. At rest on the nonrotating surface, kinetic energy is zero, gravitational potential energy is negative 2.50 times ten to the ten joules and total mechanical energy is also negative 2.50 times ten to the ten. In the final circular orbit, kinetic energy is positive 1.00 times ten to the ten joules, potential energy negative 2.00 times ten to the ten and total negative 1.00 times ten to the ten. Thus total energy increases by positive 1.50 times ten to the ten joules. It comprises a potential-energy increase of 0.50 times ten to the ten plus a kinetic-energy increase of 1.00 times ten to the ten. This is a state comparison before losses, not a transfer trajectory or a launch procedure.Rest at the model surfaceK0.00UG-2.50E-2.500Final circular orbitK+1.00UG-2.00E-1.000ΔE = -1.00 - (-2.50) = +1.50+0.50 potential + 1.00 kinetic

The mechanical-energy increase between these stated states is 1.50 × 1010 J. This is the energy that must be supplied before allowing for losses. The 5.00 × 109 J potential increase alone omits the final orbital kinetic energy.

The spatial view separates centre radius from altitude and velocity from gravitational force. The energy account compares a body initially at rest on the nonrotating model surface with the same body in the final circular orbit.

Include the final kinetic energy

Using the circular result v2 = GM/r, the final kinetic energy is:

Ek,final = ½mv2 = ½m(GM/r)
= 1.00 × 1010 J

The potential energy uses zero at infinity:

UG,final = -GMm/r = -2.00 × 1010 J
Emechanical,final = Ek,final + UG,final
= -1.00 × 1010 J

These are consequences of the radial force equation and the potential-energy expression. The total is negative relative to the infinity reference, consistent with a bound orbit.

Starting at rest on the nonrotating model surface, the initial kinetic energy is zero and initial potential energy is -2.50 × 1010 J. Therefore:

ΔEmechanical
= -1.00 × 1010 - (-2.50 × 1010)
= +1.50 × 1010 J

The increase consists of 5.00 × 109 J in potential energy and 1.00 × 1010 J in kinetic energy. A calculation that gives only the potential-energy change misses the required final motion. This is an ideal mechanical-energy change before losses, not a complete propulsion-energy calculation.

At this same radius, circular speed is 7.07 km/s, while minimum escape speed is 10.0 km/s. A maintained circular orbit and an escape to indefinitely large separation have different final conditions.

Optional check A 400 kg body starts at rest on a nonrotating model surface with U_G = -2.50 x 10^10 J. It ends in a circular orbit with U_G = -2.00 x 10^10 J and kinetic energy 1.00 x 10^10 J. What is its mechanical-energy increase before losses?
A 400 kg body starts at rest on a nonrotating model surface with U_G = -2.50 x 10^10 J. It ends in a circular orbit with U_G = -2.00 x 10^10 J and kinetic energy 1.00 x 10^10 J. What is its mechanical-energy increase before losses?

Test the radius-period relationship

For a common central mass, T2 is proportional to r3. The table gives periods generated from the supplied GM model and rounded to the nearest second. They are model values, not satellite observations.

Circular-orbit model: centre radii and model periods (periods rounded to the nearest second), GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2
Centre radius r / mPeriod T / s
80000007109
100000009935
1200000013059
1600000020106

Plot T2 vertically against r3 horizontally. Before rounding, the exact model is a straight line through the origin with gradient:

Gradient = 4π2/(GM)
= 9.869604401 × 10-14 s2/m3

The gradient represents the inverse of GM multiplied by 4π2. It is not an orbital speed. Rearranging gives GM = 4π2/gradient.

For genuine observations, differences from the circular prediction could reflect uncertainty in radius or period, a noncircular orbit, or other neglected influences. Check those conditions before attributing every mismatch to a measurement zero error.

A geostationary orbit needs more than a matching period

In the ideal model, a geostationary satellite remains above the same equatorial longitude. It has a circular orbit in Earth's equatorial plane, moves west to east in Earth's rotational sense, and has the same period as Earth's rotation.

These conditions give equal angular rates and a fixed apparent ground position. A matching period alone is insufficient: an inclined orbit changes the apparent position, while an eccentric orbit does not maintain the required constant angular rate. Reversing the orbital sense also prevents the fixed alignment.

A fixed apparent position needs matching angular motion and the correct plane

The ideal orbit is circular, equatorial and in Earth's west-to-east rotation sense, with the same period as Earth. These geometry panels are schematic in distance.

North-pole view: Earth and satellite advance 60°

The same ground point remains aligned with the satelliteSeen from above Earth's north pole, hollow markers G0 and S0 show one equatorial ground point and its satellite initially on the rightward radial line. Filled G1 and S1 show the same point and satellite one sixth of a period later. Both advance sixty degrees anticlockwise and remain on one radial line. Curved arrows show the common west-to-east rotation sense. Earth and orbit are true circles in this view, but the distance proportions are schematic. Equality of angular speed does not mean equality of tangential speed. The satellite is still moving in an Earth-centred inertial description.After T/6: 60° anticlockwiseEarthG0G1S0S160°Hollow: initially. Filled: T/6 later.

G0 and G1 are the same equatorial ground location at two times. Its radial alignment with the satellite is unchanged because both angular speeds match.

A tilted orbit does not keep the same apparent position

The equatorial-plane condition is separate from the period conditionA side view shows Earth's rotation axis through the centre and the equatorial orbital plane perpendicular to that axis. A contrasting tilted plane also passes through the centre. The view is along their common line of intersection, so both planes appear edge-on as straight lines, not as flattened circular paths. A satellite position is marked in each alternative plane. A tilted orbit of matching period changes latitude and does not remain above one ground location. The two drawings represent alternative orbital planes, not two stages of a single orbit. Distances and the illustrative inclination are schematic.Rotation axisNorthTiltedEquatorialEarthSide view: planes are seen edge-on.

Matching the rotation period alone is insufficient. The orbit must also be circular, equatorial and in Earth's rotation sense.

The alignment view shows equal angular advances of the satellite and an equatorial ground marker. The plane comparison explains why matching the period does not make an inclined orbit geostationary.

The satellite is still moving and accelerating in an Earth-centred inertial description. Gravity provides its inward resultant. Its angular speed matches Earth's rotation; its tangential speed is not the same as that of a ground marker at a smaller radius.

Supplied-period calculation

Distinguish geostationary radius from altitude

Use the supplied sidereal period T = 86164 s, about 23 h 56 min 4 s. The often-used 24 hours is a rounded approximation; use 86400 s consistently if that is what a problem supplies.

With this chapter's GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2:

r = [GMT2/(4π2)]1/3
≈ 4.2213 × 107 m
h = r - R ≈ 3.5813 × 107 m

These extra digits describe the supplied rounded model, not precise measured Earth-orbit constants. The calculated r is centre distance; h uses the same model surface radius R = 6.4 × 106 m.

Communications: the fixed apparent direction allows a ground antenna to keep pointing the same way. Weather observation: a continuing view lets changes in the same broad visible region be followed over time.

The satellite is not directly overhead every observer: its fixed ground location is equatorial. The viewing geometry is also less useful for far polar regions. The application depends on the region that must be seen, not just on the period.

Optional check Which set of conditions makes an ideal Earth satellite geostationary, rather than merely giving it Earth's rotation period?
Which set of conditions makes an ideal Earth satellite geostationary, rather than merely giving it Earth's rotation period?

Revision summary

Choose centre distance, distinguish a field quantity from a body or system quantity, and state the direction and energy reference before substituting.

Force and field strength

F = GMm/r2
g = F/m = GM/r2
Outward positive: gr = -GM/r2

G is universal; M is the source mass and m the test mass. F and g in the first two expressions are magnitudes, with attraction towards the source. Equal and opposite interaction forces act on different bodies.

For the exterior of a spherical body, use its centre: r = R + h. Do not use altitude alone or extend the external point-source model into the body's interior. Doubling r quarters the field magnitude; doubling the small test mass changes its force but not the field strength.

Over height changes small compared with R and a small surface region, g and its direction change little, giving an approximately uniform field. When gravity alone acts, free-fall acceleration equals the local g; N/kg and m/s2 are equivalent units. Support or drag changes the resultant acceleration, not the source's field.

Potential, interaction energy and work

φ = -GM/r
UG = mφ = -GMm/r
ΔUG = GMm(1/r1 - 1/r2)
Wgravity = -ΔUG

Potential is external work per unit mass to bring a small test mass from infinity to the point without changing kinetic energy. It is measured in J/kg. UG is the two-mass gravitational potential energy, in J, with zero at infinite separation. Ep = UG for the gravitational energy account here.

Moving outward makes negative potential energy less negative: ΔUG is positive and gravity does negative work. External work equals ΔUG only when kinetic energy is unchanged and no other transfer matters. Include a final kinetic-energy change and any losses when needed.

Use the negative local gradient

gr = -dφ/dr
(J/kg)/m = N/kg

For outward r positive, the isolated-source potential graph rises from a negative value towards zero. Its positive local slope gives negative gr, an inward field. Use a tangent at the required radius, not the graph height or a long chord. Distinguish tangent guide points from actual curve values.

Reflecting the negative curves across zero gives |φ| proportional to 1/r and |gr| proportional to 1/r2 over the exterior domain. Neither reaches zero at a finite radius. With more than one source, field vectors can cancel at a point while their negative scalar potentials still add.

Set the escape boundary condition

½mvescape2 - GMm/r = 0
vescape = √(2GM/r)

Minimum escape has speed and potential energy tending to zero at indefinitely large separation. The model assumes a small body, an effectively fixed source, no relevant atmosphere, losses, other sources or propulsion after release, and a path avoiding collision.

The minimum speed is independent of test mass, but the needed kinetic energy is not. Above the threshold, residual kinetic energy remains at large distance; below it, the unpowered body cannot reach infinity in this model. Constant surface-g mgh is unsuitable for an infinite-height calculation.

Specify the complete orbital state

GMm/r2 = mv2/r
v = √(GM/r)
T2 = 4π2r3/(GM)

Gravity supplies the actual inward force of a circular orbit. Velocity is tangent; acceleration is inward. No extra centripetal interaction or outward balancing force is needed in the inertial-frame account. Larger circular radius gives lower speed and longer period for the same source.

Compute both Ek = ½mv2 and UG = -GMm/r for an orbital energy account. Raising a body to the final radius without giving it the required speed is a different final state. From rest on the supplied nonrotating model surface, the 400 kg example needs a mechanical-energy increase of 1.50 × 1010 J, not merely its 5.00 × 109 J potential-energy increase.

A geostationary orbit is circular and equatorial, travels west to east like Earth, and has Earth's rotation period. Equal period alone is insufficient. Its fixed apparent direction supports communication antennas and continuing weather views, while its equatorial geometry limits where it is overhead and how well it views polar regions.

For radius-period data, use centre radii in metres and periods in seconds. Plot T2 against r3; the ideal gradient is 4π2/(GM), in s2/m3. A freely fitted intercept can differ slightly from zero when supplied periods are rounded. Actual observational differences also require checking uncertainties and model conditions.

Gravitational quantities and their units
QuantitySymbolUnit
Source mass; test massM; mkg
Centre distance; surface radius; altituder; R; hm
Gravitational constantGN m2 kg-2
Gravitational forceFN
Field magnitude; signed radial componentg; grN/kg
Gravitational potentialφJ/kg
Gravitational potential energyUG, or Ep hereJ
Kinetic energy; mechanical energyEk; Ek + UGJ
Speed; period; angular speedv; T; ωm/s; s; rad/s

GM has units m3/s2. Potential and potential energy differ by mass; field magnitude and its signed component differ by the direction convention, not by their units.

Back to mass and field strength