9478 / 2027
Gravitational Fields overview

Topic 5 of 5

Circular orbits and geostationary satellites

A circular orbit needs the correct tangential speed at its radius. Gravity supplies the inward acceleration; an energy account then distinguishes reaching that radius from reaching the complete orbital state.

Model a small satellite m outside a spherical central mass M that is effectively fixed. Neglect drag, thrust and other gravitational sources. The radius r is measured from the source centre, not its surface.

On this page: orbital energy; radius-period data; geostationary conditions.

Use gravity as the inward resultant

Uniform circular motion requires inward acceleration v2/r = rω2. Gravity supplies the actual force:

GMm/r2 = mv2/r = mrω2
v = √(GM/r)

The small satellite mass cancels. At a fixed radius around the same source, its required speed is independent of its mass, although the gravitational force is proportional to that mass.

As in the radial-force method, centripetal describes the resultant's role, not an extra interaction to add to gravity. There is no outward balancing force in this inertial-frame account. Constant speed still involves changing velocity and inward acceleration.

The period T is time for one complete revolution. Substitute v = 2πr/T into the radial equation:

GM/r = 4π2r2/T2
T2 = 4π2r3/(GM)
T = 2π√[r3/(GM)]

Larger circular orbits around the same source have lower speed and longer period. The relation v = rω does not imply greater speed at larger r here, because the different orbits do not have the same angular speed.

Estimate the orbit scale

For supplied rough scales GM about 4 × 1014 m3/s2 and centre distance r about 8 × 106 m, the speed is about 7 × 103 m/s. The circumference divided by that speed gives a period of about 7 × 103 s, of order 2 hours. These checks precede the more precise calculation.

Worked orbit and energy account

A 400 kg body at centre radius 8.0 × 106 m

Use GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2 and source radius R = 6.4 × 106 m. The orbit altitude is h = r - R = 1.6 × 106 m.

v = √[(4.0 × 1014)/(8.0 × 106)]
= 7071.07 m/s ≈ 7.07 km/s
T = 2πr/v = 7108.61 s ≈ 1.97 h

The field magnitude there is 6.25 N/kg, so the 400 kg body's gravitational force is 2500 N inward. Its velocity is tangent to the orbit.

A circular orbit needs both the correct inward force and kinetic energy

Use centre radius r = R + h

A tangent velocity and only inward gravity in the circular-orbit modelA spherical central body and circular orbit share centre O. Their radii are 96 and 120 drawing units, preserving the model distance ratio 6.4 to eight million metres. The satellite symbol itself is not to size. At the rightmost orbit point a blue tangent velocity arrow points up for anticlockwise motion. The only physical force on the 400-kilogram satellite is purple gravity, pointing left towards the centre, with magnitude 2500 newtons. There is no extra centripetal or outward balancing force. Projected dimensions identify surface radius R, altitude h from the surface and total centre radius r. The satellite's altitude is 1.6 million metres, while its orbital radius is eight million metres.Central bodyOvGravity2500 NR and r use one distance scale.Rhr = R + h

R = 6.4 × 106 m and h = 1.6 × 106 m give r = 8.0 × 106 m. The circular speed is about 7.07 km/s; this is different from the 10.0 km/s minimum escape speed at that same radius.

The full surface-rest to circular-orbit energy account

The model surface is nonrotating. All bars share one energy scale, in 1010 J. Negative values extend left of zero; positive values extend right. E = K + UG is total mechanical energy.

The required mechanical-energy increase is fifteen billion joulesTwo signed bar accounts use one scale, seventy drawing units per ten to the ten joules, and the same zero coordinate. At rest on the nonrotating surface, kinetic energy is zero, gravitational potential energy is negative 2.50 times ten to the ten joules and total mechanical energy is also negative 2.50 times ten to the ten. In the final circular orbit, kinetic energy is positive 1.00 times ten to the ten joules, potential energy negative 2.00 times ten to the ten and total negative 1.00 times ten to the ten. Thus total energy increases by positive 1.50 times ten to the ten joules. It comprises a potential-energy increase of 0.50 times ten to the ten plus a kinetic-energy increase of 1.00 times ten to the ten. This is a state comparison before losses, not a transfer trajectory or a launch procedure.Rest at the model surfaceK0.00UG-2.50E-2.500Final circular orbitK+1.00UG-2.00E-1.000ΔE = -1.00 - (-2.50) = +1.50+0.50 potential + 1.00 kinetic

The mechanical-energy increase between these stated states is 1.50 × 1010 J. This is the energy that must be supplied before allowing for losses. The 5.00 × 109 J potential increase alone omits the final orbital kinetic energy.

The spatial view separates centre radius from altitude and velocity from gravitational force. The energy account compares a body initially at rest on the nonrotating model surface with the same body in the final circular orbit.

Include the final kinetic energy

Using the circular result v2 = GM/r, the final kinetic energy is:

Ek,final = ½mv2 = ½m(GM/r)
= 1.00 × 1010 J

The potential energy uses zero at infinity:

UG,final = -GMm/r = -2.00 × 1010 J
Emechanical,final = Ek,final + UG,final
= -1.00 × 1010 J

These are consequences of the radial force equation and the potential-energy expression. The total is negative relative to the infinity reference, consistent with a bound orbit.

Starting at rest on the nonrotating model surface, the initial kinetic energy is zero and initial potential energy is -2.50 × 1010 J. Therefore:

ΔEmechanical
= -1.00 × 1010 - (-2.50 × 1010)
= +1.50 × 1010 J

The increase consists of 5.00 × 109 J in potential energy and 1.00 × 1010 J in kinetic energy. A calculation that gives only the potential-energy change misses the required final motion. This is an ideal mechanical-energy change before losses, not a complete propulsion-energy calculation.

At this same radius, circular speed is 7.07 km/s, while minimum escape speed is 10.0 km/s. A maintained circular orbit and an escape to indefinitely large separation have different final conditions.

Optional check A 400 kg body starts at rest on a nonrotating model surface with U_G = -2.50 x 10^10 J. It ends in a circular orbit with U_G = -2.00 x 10^10 J and kinetic energy 1.00 x 10^10 J. What is its mechanical-energy increase before losses?
A 400 kg body starts at rest on a nonrotating model surface with U_G = -2.50 x 10^10 J. It ends in a circular orbit with U_G = -2.00 x 10^10 J and kinetic energy 1.00 x 10^10 J. What is its mechanical-energy increase before losses?

Test the radius-period relationship

For a common central mass, T2 is proportional to r3. The table gives periods generated from the supplied GM model and rounded to the nearest second. They are model values, not satellite observations.

Circular-orbit model: centre radii and model periods (periods rounded to the nearest second), GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2
Centre radius r / mPeriod T / s
80000007109
100000009935
1200000013059
1600000020106

Plot T2 vertically against r3 horizontally. Before rounding, the exact model is a straight line through the origin with gradient:

Gradient = 4π2/(GM)
= 9.869604401 × 10-14 s2/m3

The gradient represents the inverse of GM multiplied by 4π2. It is not an orbital speed. Rearranging gives GM = 4π2/gradient.

For genuine observations, differences from the circular prediction could reflect uncertainty in radius or period, a noncircular orbit, or other neglected influences. Check those conditions before attributing every mismatch to a measurement zero error.

A geostationary orbit needs more than a matching period

In the ideal model, a geostationary satellite remains above the same equatorial longitude. It has a circular orbit in Earth's equatorial plane, moves west to east in Earth's rotational sense, and has the same period as Earth's rotation.

These conditions give equal angular rates and a fixed apparent ground position. A matching period alone is insufficient: an inclined orbit changes the apparent position, while an eccentric orbit does not maintain the required constant angular rate. Reversing the orbital sense also prevents the fixed alignment.

A fixed apparent position needs matching angular motion and the correct plane

The ideal orbit is circular, equatorial and in Earth's west-to-east rotation sense, with the same period as Earth. These geometry panels are schematic in distance.

North-pole view: Earth and satellite advance 60°

The same ground point remains aligned with the satelliteSeen from above Earth's north pole, hollow markers G0 and S0 show one equatorial ground point and its satellite initially on the rightward radial line. Filled G1 and S1 show the same point and satellite one sixth of a period later. Both advance sixty degrees anticlockwise and remain on one radial line. Curved arrows show the common west-to-east rotation sense. Earth and orbit are true circles in this view, but the distance proportions are schematic. Equality of angular speed does not mean equality of tangential speed. The satellite is still moving in an Earth-centred inertial description.After T/6: 60° anticlockwiseEarthG0G1S0S160°Hollow: initially. Filled: T/6 later.

G0 and G1 are the same equatorial ground location at two times. Its radial alignment with the satellite is unchanged because both angular speeds match.

A tilted orbit does not keep the same apparent position

The equatorial-plane condition is separate from the period conditionA side view shows Earth's rotation axis through the centre and the equatorial orbital plane perpendicular to that axis. A contrasting tilted plane also passes through the centre. The view is along their common line of intersection, so both planes appear edge-on as straight lines, not as flattened circular paths. A satellite position is marked in each alternative plane. A tilted orbit of matching period changes latitude and does not remain above one ground location. The two drawings represent alternative orbital planes, not two stages of a single orbit. Distances and the illustrative inclination are schematic.Rotation axisNorthTiltedEquatorialEarthSide view: planes are seen edge-on.

Matching the rotation period alone is insufficient. The orbit must also be circular, equatorial and in Earth's rotation sense.

The alignment view shows equal angular advances of the satellite and an equatorial ground marker. The plane comparison explains why matching the period does not make an inclined orbit geostationary.

The satellite is still moving and accelerating in an Earth-centred inertial description. Gravity provides its inward resultant. Its angular speed matches Earth's rotation; its tangential speed is not the same as that of a ground marker at a smaller radius.

Supplied-period calculation

Distinguish geostationary radius from altitude

Use the supplied sidereal period T = 86164 s, about 23 h 56 min 4 s. The often-used 24 hours is a rounded approximation; use 86400 s consistently if that is what a problem supplies.

With this chapter's GM = 4.0 × 1014 m3/s2:

r = [GMT2/(4π2)]1/3
≈ 4.2213 × 107 m
h = r - R ≈ 3.5813 × 107 m

These extra digits describe the supplied rounded model, not precise measured Earth-orbit constants. The calculated r is centre distance; h uses the same model surface radius R = 6.4 × 106 m.

Communications: the fixed apparent direction allows a ground antenna to keep pointing the same way. Weather observation: a continuing view lets changes in the same broad visible region be followed over time.

The satellite is not directly overhead every observer: its fixed ground location is equatorial. The viewing geometry is also less useful for far polar regions. The application depends on the region that must be seen, not just on the period.

Optional check Which set of conditions makes an ideal Earth satellite geostationary, rather than merely giving it Earth's rotation period?
Which set of conditions makes an ideal Earth satellite geostationary, rather than merely giving it Earth's rotation period?