Why leaders chose appeasement

G2 Full History - syllabus K227, 2027

Britain and France gave way to Hitler because they feared another war, but each gain made Germany stronger and bolder.

Why did Britain and France give way? The huge losses of the First World War made another war terrifying. Economic problems and doubts about military readiness encouraged caution. People also feared air raids that could kill many civilians. Some British people thought parts of Versailles were unfair, and that reasonable changes might satisfy Germany. Chamberlain hoped that personal negotiation could build lasting cooperation.

Britain kept rearming, building up its armed forces, while it negotiated. Avoiding war in 1938 gave it more time to prepare. But Germany also gained time, along with land, resources and Czechoslovakia's defences. Each gain won by pressure encouraged Hitler to expect more. So a policy meant to avoid war could weaken resistance to aggression.

Winston Churchill, a British MP, or member of Parliament, criticised appeasement. He also wanted peace, but argued for deterrence: discouraging an attack by making it look too costly or likely to fail. So the debate was about how to keep the peace, not whether war was good.

A fair judgement first explains the pressures leaders faced, then tests the results. It should not assume that a different policy would definitely have stopped Hitler.

Why appease
Fear of war, weak economies, unready forces, fear of bombing.
Cost
Germany gained land, resources and time.
Churchill
Argued for deterrence instead.

Worked example: Separate aim from result

A student writes: Chamberlain wanted peace, so appeasement succeeded.

  1. Aim: wanting peace explains why he negotiated.
  2. Short term: Munich avoided war in September 1938.
  3. Long term: Germany grew stronger and kept expanding, so peace did not last.

Watch out for this

Rearming shows Chamberlain was not really trying to avoid war.

He negotiated to avoid war and rearmed in case talks failed. Both were part of his policy.

Check your understanding

What did Churchill argue instead of appeasement?

  1. That Britain should attack Germany at once.
  2. That Germany should get all it asked for.
  3. Deterrence: make an attack look too costly to try.
Sources and context

Background reading for this chapter.

  • A public commitment to consultation

    Anglo-German declaration signed by Hitler and Chamberlain, 30 September 1938, as read in Chamberlain's House of Commons statement on 3 October. Paraphrase of the declaration, not the whole speech.

  • Chamberlain defends Munich

    Neville Chamberlain, British prime minister, addressing the House of Commons, 3 October 1938, after returning from Munich. Paraphrase of passages on the agreement, Czechoslovakia, future peace and rearmament.

  • Churchill challenges the settlement

    Winston Churchill, Conservative MP and critic of the government's appeasement policy, speaking in the House of Commons, 5 October 1938. Paraphrase of passages on deterrence and Czechoslovakia.

  • A record of Hitler's private discussion

    Colonel Friedrich Hossbach's memorandum, dated 10 November 1937, recording Hitler's meeting with senior military and foreign-policy officials on 5 November. Paraphrase of the recorded discussion; the memorandum is not a word-for-word transcript.

  • Munich Pact, 29 September 1938, clauses 1-4

    Munich Pact, dated 29 September 1938 and signed by Germany, Britain, France and Italy in the early hours of 30 September. Paraphrase of clauses 1-4; Czechoslovakia was later represented on the implementation commission.

The Wise Otter

Getting your study space ready